Research methodology in restaurant business

The committee notes that reminders should be issued in a timely manner and with a specific due date that would meet the timing in the directive.

Google scholar

FSIS may also be able to obtain data from other organizations about past inspections, at least of facilities in areas of the country that have rigorous local inspection programs. Initially, it may rely on expert judgment of current inspectors and state and local food regulatory agencies for this type of information by using expert elicitation; ultimately, more sophisticated primary data may be available to fill this data gap. The committee believes that this is appropriate and suggests that FSIS refrain from calling them risk- based because in their present form they do not fully meet the criteria for such a designation, although that should be its future goal. The last respondent is KFC. Focus groups are usually made up of five to ten participants. The I-C I committee had difficulty in understanding some of the five risk factors or considerations, particularly inherent risk, used by FSIS in categorizing the business types into tiers for surveillance priority-setting and recommended that they all be weighted to reflect a risk-based approach better. FSIS stated that it would include restaurants, retailers, custom- exempt establishments, and institutions in its for-cause surveillance category and that these businesses would not be part of risk-based initial surveillance. Thus, this analysis assumes that the frequency of the word is an indication of the subject matters relative significance. Or perhaps it inadvertently carried over the Tier 1 business types from earlier documents; they are identical with those presented to the I-C I committee as Tier I. The basis on which to set priorities for initial and followup surveillance i. For this research, only secondary data type of data will be gathered. Accessed January 29, Historical analysis denotes a methodological approach that employs qualitative instead of quantitative measurement and the use of primary historical documents or historians interpretations thereof in service of theory development and testing. Facilities that were receiving vigorous inspection by other federal agencies or by state or local agencies would be considered as having low priority for FSIS surveillance; typical examples are restaurants, institutions, and retailers. Furthermore, the availability of CSR disclosures by KFC makes this fast food corporation a good candidate as a research respondent.

The present committee was informed that FSIS does not automatically conduct initial surveillance activities during for-cause visits unless evidence suggests that they are needed.

The relevant information produced is then used to create a CSR guideline for those publicly-listed fast food corporations.

Research methodology in restaurant business

As FDA has a program for assisting in the development of the capacities of state and local jurisdictions,11 it may be valuable for FSIS to look into that effort as it considers its own assessment of local programs. These suggestions agree with recommendation made by the I-C I committee. Furthermore, the availability of CSR disclosures by KFC makes this fast food corporation a good candidate as a research respondent. Use a funnel approach. Information about product-control actions, investigations, and enforcement actions is also entered into the ICS. Recruit Participants. With the use of such documents, this study will take on the qualitative approach of research. FSIS provides instructions to its compliance officers on how to conduct in-commerce surveillance activities.

Majority of the study is done by gathering secondary data from various libraries, government agencies and the internet. Research Procedure The researchers will initially perform a profiling of the pre-determined publicly-listed fast food corporations in Cebu City using the audited financial statements of the sample fast food corporations McDo, KFC and Jollibeewith four profile attributes, namely: a size, b age, c profitability, and d media exposure contributing their respective websites, published literatures, media releases and other relevant corporate documents.

The directive does not provide clear, objective guidelines on how to determine whether followup surveillance is necessary or how soon it should be scheduled.

methodology of junk food

You should be conducting market research every year to make sure your restaurant is still giving your customers what they want. A CID investigator who finds products that are out of compliance may initiate an investigation, conduct followup activities as outlined in the appropriate surveillance program Directive To find objective participants, place an ad on social media or in publications like a local newspaper.

It was modified and expanded by their business partner, Ray Kroc, of Oak Park, Illinois, who later bought out the business interests of the McDonald brothers and formed McDonald's Corporation.

restaurant customer satisfaction survey pdf

FSIS asked that the second committee I-C II review and comment on new proposals for procedures to organize followup surveillance activities of in-commerce businesses when necessary after an initial surveillance visit.

All rights reserved.

Description of methodology of junk food

An initial surveillance visit that identifies no apparent violation of FSIS requirements leads to no scheduled followup. Thus, this analysis assumes that the frequency of the word is an indication of the subject matters relative significance. Such issues would require an investigation and are outside the scope of this review. It also states that an investigator may contact other investigators at FSIS or other federal, state, or local agencies with knowledge of a business in question and may offer representatives of such agencies an opportunity to participate in the surveillance activity. Reynolds food and tobacco conglomerate, who later sold the chain to PepsiCo. It defines the problem and the goals, examines the arguments, and analyzes implementation of the policy. No findings.

In order to reduce subjectivity in CID surveillance activities and make results of surveillance as objective and consistent as possible, FSIS should provide greater clarity and definition in Directive As noted previously, CID investigators can also initiate investigations in response to particular findings.

Rated 8/10 based on 117 review
Chapter 3 Methodology