Were his actions really a matter of fate?
But where was mine? If, alternately, you believe that the novel is purely for entertainment purposes, substantiate your claim with textual evidence. You may wish to go beyond this suggestion to offer a well-considered opinion about who you believe to be the most reliable narrator, and why.
What is this essay suppose to be about other than discrimination? Alter Ego Alter egos often populate works of fiction, and it's always interesting to argue that two characters do or do not represent different sides of the same character.
You just have to prove that he faced social injustice throughout his life, this is why; he couldn't decide what is wrong and what is right. You could develop a thesis on that narrative strategy, discussing whether it works cohesively, or whether Shelley should have eliminated some of the epistolary influences, instead sticking to third-person omniscient.
He escapes his apartment and eventually coming back he discovers that the monster is gone leaving Viktor in the pain of remorse.
For this purpose, it is must for a student to read the novel, Frankenstein and understand the themes Merry Shelley used to convey a message to her readers. Devoid of friend, love, and soul, and having no place in the world, he seeks to take revenge on his creator and his closest acquaintances.
To do so, you will need to consider whether her strategy serves a purpose that is not readily apparent, such as reflecting the monster's creation, or whether it was just a quick way for her to develop the story without having to finesse point of view.
Provide more info. Playing God, though, implies that a character is flawed by excessive hubris, which may or may not be applicable to Victor.